However, nearly every count raises its own unique issues. A typical scenario has been provided with most issues and a counting resolution developed for its characteristics. These issues are provided as a guide for FP Analysts to develop resolutions for their own issues. It is recommended that all major counting issues and their proposed resolutions be approved by the Function Point Administrator before being officially adopted and incorporated into this document.
If No then check if the process or data is a user required quality or technical feature:. NOTE: The recommended strategy for resolving issues is to check that the process or data you are evaluating is a user business function and exists for business reasons not just for technical or design reasons. One of the best methods of doing this is to try and determine other ways in which the same user requirement could be implemented. Counting Issues would not be identified as such if their resolutions were clear-cut.
In the issues described in this manual, the resolutions presented represent the best opinion of Total Metrics consultants who specialize in providing IFPUG function point analysis related services.
The first step is to determine the type of function point count. There are variations of the counting procedure depending on whether the count is for a development project, an enhancement project, or an installed application:.
Initially it is the same as the development project count, but it is then updated as a result of each successive enhancement project. Performance and monitoring Chapter Copy Export Chapter Disaster Recovery Testing Appendix A. JES3 examples and information Appendix D. Sample job control language Appendix F. Library Manager volume categories Appendix G. Case study for logical partitioning of a two-cluster grid. Subscribe to newsletter.
LinkedIn RSS. United States. Published 19 April View online Download PDF More options Permanent link Rate and comment Tell us what you think.
0コメント